Tuesday, 26 November 2013

European Commission has Reopened an Investigation - Fish News EU

Fish News EU Reports 25 November 2013

THE European Commission has reopened an investigation into salmon farming in Ireland following the revelation that the country's Department for Agriculture, Food and the Marine concealed vital information and relied on bad science when presenting their case.

In 2009 the European Commission investigated the impact of sea lice from salmon farms on wild salmon stocks. They repeatedly requested viewpoints of Inland Fisheries Ireland, the government body responsible for the conservation of wild salmon. IFI prepared a file, but the Department for Agriculture refused to forward it as it stated salmon farming put nearby wild salmon stocks at serious risk.

Instead, the Department of Agriculture presented a case that relied on a single study by the Marine Institute which suggested sea lice from salmon farms pose no problem at all. On the basis of this evidence the case was closed in June 2012.

During this time Bord Iascaigh Mhara was also using this faulty research to promote the massive increase in salmon farming around Ireland's coast.

However, in August the Marine Institute's research was discredited by an international team of experts. The damning critique was published in the Journal of Fish Disease – the world's most authoritative publication of the topic. Little has been heard of this study since, and the Marine Institute has yet to respond.

Meanwhile, Save Bantry Bay and Friends of the Irish Environment submitted Freedom of Information request for all documents relating to the EU investigation. Upon receipt of the documents it quickly became apparent vital evidence was suppressed, and requests were sent for the European Commission to reopen their investigations.

"The Department of Agriculture's history of presenting bad science as fact, and suppressing evidence of the negative impacts of salmon farming has finally caught up with them," said Kieran O'Shea, chairman of Save Bantry Bay.

Alec O'Donovan, secretary of Save Bantry Bay, added: "It is time for Ireland's salmon farming policy and the aquaculture licensing system to be opened to scrutiny. While the European Commission investigations may be confined to the impacts of sea lice, we ask that the Irish Government initiate a full independent review covering all aspects of the national salmon farming agenda."

Monday, 25 November 2013

Irish Government Department under Investigation of Cover Up

Salmon Watch Ireland Press Statement 24 November 2013

European Commission to re-open its investigation into the impact of salmon farming on wild salmon

(24 November 2013) - Salmon Watch Ireland welcomes the decision of the European Commission to re-open its file on complaints submitted to it in 2009 about the impact of salmon farm generated sea lice on migrating juvenile wild salmon. The complaints had been lodged by Salmon Watch Ireland (‘SWIRL’) and Friends of the Irish Environment (‘FIE’). The re-opening of the file has resulted from FIE drawing the attention of the Commission to the fact that an analysis of data about the impact of sea lice on juvenile wild salmons by the Marine Institute has been strongly contested by an eminent group of international scientists.

In addition to the re-opening of the Commission file, the Irish Ombudsman is conducting an inquiry into allegations that the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine withheld from the Commission’s investigation of the SWIRL/FIE complaints a report from Inland Fisheries Ireland which gave a very different picture about the impact of sea lice and Irish efforts to control it, than that put forward by the Department; the Department has responsibility for both the development and the regulation of salmon farming. The Ombudsman has recently extended his investigation to include the actions of the Department of Foreign Affairs in the matter.

The Commission has re-opened its file on the sea lice issue as a result of its’ attention being drawn to a paper in the Journal of Fish Diseases in August 2013 which seriously questioned the analysis of sea lice data by a number of scientists from the Marine Institute (‘MI’) published in the same journal earlier in 2013. The Marine Institute analysis (in a version published in papers in 2011) was relied on by Bord Iascaigh Mhara in the compilation of its’ Environmental Impact Statement for the Galway Bay super-salmon-farm project. The authors of the August 2013 paper, led by Professor M Krkosek of the University of Toronto, concluded that were ‘fundamental methodological errors’ in the MI analysis and that rather than sea-lice having a 1% impact on survival rates of salmon at sea, the true rate is of the order of 34%.

Despite undertakings to do so, the MI have to date failed to respond to the Krkosek paper’s criticisms.

Commenting on these developments, the chair of the board of Salmon Watch Ireland, Niall Greene, said: ‘The decision of the EU Commission to reopen its file on the 2009 complaints of Salmon Watch Ireland and Friends of the Irish Environment, about the impact of salmon farm generated concentrations of sea lice on wild salmon, is a very significant development. Taken together with the Irish Ombudsman’s investigation into allegations that the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine failed to transmit critical information relevant to the Commission’s investigations of the complaints, this means that the behaviour of the Department, of BIM and of the Marine Institute on salmon farming issues is once again now under close scrutiny’ .

Sunday, 17 November 2013

'Red tape', salmon farming and environmental threats

MR RICHIE Flynn wishes Minister Coveney would use his powers to fast-track decision making on salmon farms, reports The Southern Star on October 19th. Would this really benefit rural coastal areas such as West Cork? Quite the contrary, believes Save Bantry Bay.
Far from boosting local economies, salmon farming could be disastrous for these areas, destroying fish stocks, water quality, valuable tourism businesses and the angling sector.

Far from idling in a sea of apathy, as Richie Flynn suggests, Minister Coveney is actually making considerable efforts to increase Ireland’s farmed salmon output at an unprecedented rate. His plan is for Bord Iascaigh Mhara (BIM) to develop a series of gargantuan salmon farms around the coast. The first, in Galway Bay, would alone double Ireland’s farmed salmon production in one fell swoop.
Unsurprisingly this proposal has met with considerable opposition – just as the proposal to expand salmon farming in Bantry Bay has.

Many of the objections focused on the impact of sea lice from salmon farms on wild salmon and sea trout.
Quick to respond to the controversy, BIM contracted a top marketing agency and the big sell began.
Soon came BIM’s and the pro-salmon farm lobby’s next big trump – the publication of a series of research papers by the Marine Institute which claimed the exact opposite to all other research to date, namely, that sea lice from salmon farms do not have a negative impact on wild salmon.

One paper actually stated there are more thriving salmon rivers in areas near fish farms than elsewhere. It didn’t take long for BIM, the Irish Farmers Association and the pro-salmon farm lobby to be using words like ‘definitive’, ‘conclusive’, ‘unequivocal’ when quoting these studies. The public was told that salmon farming is 100% sustainable and will be the economic salvation of coastal areas in south-west Ireland.

Now, all such claims have ceased. Instead a very obvious silence reigns. Why? The Marine Institute’s research has been rubbished by an international team of experts. It turns out that rather than showing sea lice have no impact, their data in fact shows they’re detrimental to the future of wild salmon. When the international team re-analysed the figures using more accepted methods, it proved sea lice are in fact causing a one-third decrease in nearby wild salmon populations – a figure that is almost identical to what other research studies found.

Given the backbone of the argument for the Bantry Bay and Galway Bay salmon farm was the Marine Institute’s research findings, BIM’s silence, in particular, is profound. For it is now clear, if the mega farms go ahead, some of Ireland’s most famous salmon rivers will be at risk of collapse.
So it seems that the Marine Institute, a government agency whose responsibility is impartiality, is happy to produce bad science, specifically to support a particular government minister’s policy. Its reputation lies in tatters.

To make matters worse, throughout this, Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI) scientific experts and environmental groups have been attempting to warn Minister Coveney that he is being misled. Their voices have been quickly shot down, with the response from government being that the Marine Institute’s research has given the final answer.

Simon Coveney did not want to listen. He thought he was covered, noting the Marine Institute’s research and further backing his case by stating the EU had closed an investigation into the impact of sea lice in Ireland. In May 2013, he informed the Oireachtas: ‘The European Commission has been very clear that it now accepts that the systems in place in Ireland to control sea lice and salmon farms are probably the best anywhere in Europe. As far as we are concerned, the sea lice issue is no longer significant.’


Shockingly, it turns out the EU case investigating the impact of sealice from salmon farms on wild Irish salmon closed following the Department of Agriculture actively withholding information from the European Commission. Had all the information been submitted, the case may have had a very different outcome. IFI had specifically prepared a report following a request from the European Commission that clearly noted the Department of Agriculture’s views were ‘not consistent with available information’. It made it quite clear the bulk of research pointed to sea lice from salmon farms having a significant and serious impact on wild salmon.

But the commission did not get this information. When Simon Coveney became minister, pressure was put on IFI’s supervisors at the Department for Communications, Energy and Natural resources not to submit IFI’s views.

Coveney is recorded saying these views ‘would not only be misleading but would also cause confusion in the public mind regarding sea lice controls and possibly undermine the state’s regulatory system… I would ask you to withdraw the formal observations of your department and to support the observations supplied to the commission by DAFF.’

The EU has now received information contained within the dossier released under the Freedom of Information Act and is considering reopening the case.
Today, Ireland is under threat of EU fines of €4m due to our government’s apathy in implementing environmental laws. Is this really what Richie Flynn desires? Maybe we should be thankful of that much-criticised ‘red tape’ in place to slow down the likes of BIM, IFA and the salmon farming lobby’s attempts to foist polluting industries on us, giving jobs at any price.
• Alec O’Donovan is secretary of the Save Bantry Bay group.


In one of her first actions as EU Ombudsman, Emily O’Reilly has instructed her office to seek an explanation from the European Commission’s Environmental Directorate as to why they have not replied to allegations of maladministration brought by Friends of the Irish Environment in June of this year.

The allegations, contained in a 264 page dossier submitted to the Commission, allege that the European Commission failed to complete the terms of its investigation into Ireland’s regulation of sea lice on salmon farms and their impact on wild salmon.

FIE alleges that the terms of the investigation sought the ‘direct views’ of Inland Fisheries Ireland as the body responsible for salmon in Irish rivers. Citing communications obtained through requests under Access to Information on the Environment, it claims that a report entirely damming of the official Department of Agriculture submission to the EU was prepared by Inland Fisheries Ireland in 2010 and sent to the Department of Agriculture.
The Inland Fisheries Ireland Report, published on the FIE website, is a damning commentary on the official position put in by the Department of Agriculture in response to the EU investigation. It states that current practices ‘do not constitute good sea lice control’ and that that ‘Mortalities of salmonoids attributable to sea lice have been well documented.’

The Department of Agriculture suppressed the Report and told the Commission they had not received it, according to correspondence obtained by the environmental group. Consequently the investigation was closed and the Department of Agriculture announced a plan to create nine mega salmon farms along Ireland’s western bays. A licence application for the first, in Galway Bay, is now before the Minister for Agriculture.

The Irish Ombudsman has opened investigations into the role the Department of Agriculture in allegedly suppressing the Report. It has recently extended the investigation to the Department of Foreign Affairs, who acted as contact point for the EU, for maladministration in not ensuring the requested Report was provided by Ireland.

A response was promised by the Commission by September 2013 but to date none has been received. Consequently, FIE referred the matter to the EU Ombudsman who has instructed her officers ‘to contact the Commission’s services in order to explore the possibility of finding a rapid solution to your complaint.’

FIE Director Tony Lowes said ‘It is to everyone’s benefit that the investigations underway in Ireland and Europe are addressed as quickly as possible.’

Further information and comment: Tony Lowes 353 27 74771 / 353 87 2176316

Copy of EU Ombudsman letter

Index of all documents referred to and copies of all submissions:

Monday, 21 October 2013

Environmental Catastrophe along a Norwegian River

Its starting to look like an Environmental Catastrophe along a Norwegian River called the Vikedalselva. Reports on the ground are coming through that a major escape of farmed salmon has infiltrated the river in large numbers. Local fishermen along the Vikedalselva are reporting that the media are not covering the story and feel the issue is being totally ignored by the authorities. Salmon ladders along the river have been closed to purge developing fish...


There has long been concern that escaped farmed salmon may harm the various wild fish populations through hybridisation and altering the gene pools of wild populations (Hansen et al. 1991).There are several problems that can arise in this connection. If the farmed salmon have different characteristics and adaptations from wild salmon populations, gene flow may cause the wild salmon populations to lose characteristics that are crucial in a natural environment, while they adopt more of the farmed salmon's characteristics.

On the other hand, if the escaped farmed salmon have less genetic variation than wild stocks, gene flow to the wild population will cause individual populations to lose variation (Tufto & Hindar). Variation is essential for two reasons (Hedrick, 2000), evaluated from both a short-term and a long-term perspective. A population that loses variation and thus becomes genetically uniform will be less resistant to disease and parasites. Or put another way: it is easier for a parasite to adapt to a population of genetically similar individuals (few polymorphic loci in the population and low heterozygosity) and where the individuals themselves have little variation (the individuals have few heterozygous loci).

Additionally, in theory some of the harmful, recessive alleles will increase in frequency and produce less viable individuals (inbreeding depression). Studies just out (Reed & Frankham, 2003) empirically show that there is a good connection between fitness and heterozygosity, population size and quantitative genetic variation. Heterozygosity explains about 20% of the variation in fitness. In the long term, a population with little polymorphism will not have as great an evolutionary potential as a population with a lot of genetic variation.

All escaped farmed fish will come from a small number of farmed populations, which will lead to different populations becoming more like one another. It has also been claimed that coadapted gene complexes may dissolve. The following is an attempt to clarify relevant concepts and summarise empirical studies.

Saturday, 12 October 2013

Salmon Labeling: "Responsibly Farmed" nothing short of a Lie

The labeling "Responsibly Farmed" on farmed salmon in Irish Supermarket Chains is a complete contradiction. Why you may ask? In the nutshell, science has proven the negative impacts Salmon Farms have on native species of juvenile sea trout and salmon. It is far from Responsible to place a salmon farm on any coastline in the direct migratory path of native species. Salmon farms have proven to be connected to the mass decline of sea trout and salmon in many river systems around the world. Lets not forget the famous sea trout collapse in Connemara after they placed salmon farms along the West Coast of Ireland back in the 80's.

And here we are in 2013 with major supermarkets chains trying to convince their unknowing customers that everything is ok since a label has been added to fancy packaging on farmed salmon with famous words like "Responsibly Farmed" or  "Organic". All to allay any fears or suspicions to the customer that anything is wrong. 

So the customer adds the salmon product to their basket and heads to checkout. The money from this bought farmed salmon then lines the pockets of the supermarkets and salmon farmers which is a multi billion euro industry.

The losers in this game are you the public, native fish species and local environment. Lets not forget the human health issue's associated with farmed salmon. The fish are artificially fed, dipped in chemicals and pesticides and grown in packed cages that hold up 250,000 salmon.


Thursday, 10 October 2013

Farmed Salmon being Sold as Organic Produce

Organic Trust Ireland - Members website listing

Algaran Teo - Organic Seaweed Products Manufacturer

Algaran Teo is an organic seaweed products manufacturer.

Ardgroom Shellfish Ltd

Ardgroom Shellfish grow organic rope mussels in Ardgroom Harbour, Beara Peninsula, Co Cork

Clarkes Salmon Smokery

The Clarke family in Ballina have been synonymous with wild Irish salmon since Jackie Clarke first set up business in Ballina in 1945. A family…

Connemara Seafoods Frozen Ltd

Ireland's leading cultivator and producer of fresh, frozen, pasteurised and organic seafood products.

De Brun Iasc Teo

Ted Browne and his wife Hannah Mae started this family business from a garage in the back garden of their home in 1984.

Good Fish Processing (Carrigaline) Ltd

The Good Fish Company is a family run specialist fish processor and retailer, committed to providing the Freshest Irish fish and seafood to its customers.…

Ireland West Seafare

Top quality fish for sale.

Kenmare Select

Kenmare Select is a leading exporter of Irish salmon smoked in the country of origin!

Ummera Smoked Products Ltd

About Ummera ..... For nearly forty years Ummera has built up an enviable reputation for producing some of the finest smoked salmon available.

Wrights of Howth

In 1893 the Wright family began smoking Irish Salmon. The craft has been passed down through the generations and little has changed. We still fillet…

Yawl Bay Seafoods Ltd

We are a second-generation family business taking our name from the nearby Youghal Bay (pronounced 'Yawl').

Saturday, 3 August 2013

Manipulation and Confusion of the Consumer

Salmon Farmers have used the word Organic salmon on the packaging to manipulate and confuse consumers into buying their toxic farmed salmon.

The purpose of organic labels is to give consumers confidence that they can choose a product that has a significantly lower ecological footprint than that of conventional products. And, for many it may also be considered the healthier choice – a product free from harmful chemical residues that can be associated with intensive agriculture. Sadly, when it comes to organic farmed salmon this is not the case. It may come as a surprise to consumers to learn the farmed salmon organic label is instead masking a myriad of environmental impacts.

“What comes to mind when you think about certified organic food? Perhaps you think of food that is better for us and the planet. Food that avoids synthetic pesticides. Livestock that are fed a 100 per cent certified organic diet. It seems intuitive that the same organic principles that exist for land-grown organic produce, livestock and dairy should also apply to farmed fish. This is apparently not going to be the case.” David Suzuki Foundation, Canada, 2012.

The reality is organic farmed salmon:

• Contributes to the depletion of wild fish stocks
• Encourages non-organic aquaculture of other species
• Is treated with synthetic pesticides and antibiotics, which are released directly into the sea
• Emits vast quantities of fish waste, polluting the sea and contributing to harmful algal blooms
• Infects wild salmon and sea trout stocks with parasites and diseases
• Allows escapees to breed with wild salmon, weakening them genetically
• Causes mortalities of endangered marine mammals

These practices are inconsistent with current organic agricultural standards and not what consumers have come to expect from an ‘organic’ label.

Organic Salmon Farming in Ireland

Organic salmon farming dominates Irish fin-fish aquaculture. What is more, it is an area earmarked for a greater level of growth than for any other area of food production.
They key players: Simon Coveney, Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine; Donal Maguire and Jason Whooley from Bord Iascaigh Mhara; and Richie Flynn of the Irish Farmers Association; can be heard on an almost daily basis promoting the development of this industry. Interestingly, this growth is backed in policy documents Food Harvest 2020 and Our Oceans Wealth. Indeed, if we are to believe what they say, organic farmed salmon offers consumers around the world a healthy, sustainable choice of fish. But, is this true?

Depletion of wild fish stocks and encouragement of non-organic aquaculture

Salmon are carnivores, and in the wild their diet consists of nothing but smaller fish and crustaceans. The diet of farmed salmon must replicate that of wild salmon for them to gain the nutrition they need. However, here lies a problem – today’s fish stocks are highly depleted and many fisheries are deemed unsustainable. To combat this issue, the theory was organic salmon farmers would use filleting waste from sea fisheries that have won sustainable status from organisations such as the Marine Stewardship Council. Alternatively, farmed salmon could be fed on products derived from other forms of organic aquaculture. In addition, vegetable proteins could be used.
Unfortunately, this approach failed. Not enough of this sustainable fish waste, nor organic based aquaculture products are available to meet the demand. Research has also shown salmon fed on vegetable protein had reduced levels of omega 3 fatty acids that is claimed to be the primary benefit of eating farmed salmon. As a result, the rules have been changed to allow fish meal and oil from unsustainable sea fisheries and non-organic aquaculture operations to be used.
What does this mean? Today, organic salmon farming is supporting unsustainable sea fisheries, placing additional pressure on already strained global fish stocks, and encourages non-organic aquaculture practices.
In no other form of organic livestock farming are such practices allowed.

Chemicals, Pesticides and Antibiotics

The flesh of wild salmon is pink – a result of the crustaceans in their diet. However, as a result of their artificial diet, farmed organic salmon’s flesh is grey. Unsurprisingly, consumers do not want to eat grey salmon. For this reason, organic salmon farmers use the same colouring as is used by conventional salmon farmers. It’s called Phaffia, and is an industrially produced yeast that contains high levels of astaxanthin.
Organic salmon farms are also at liberty to use immunisations, chemical treatments and antibiotics to combat disease and parasites such as sea lice. Extraordinarily, most used today are not natural based products but the same chemically synthesised treatments used in non-organic aquaculture. As most treatments are given in-feed, they are released directly into the sea in the form of fish pellets and indirectly in fish faeces. This causes untold damage to marine life and valuable fish stocks (see below). Then there’s the additional issue of the development of anti-biotic resistance.
In order to control sea lice the legislation states that only two treatments are allowed per year. There is an exception where compulsory eradication is required. Given the on going presence of sea lice on Irish salmon farms, the reality is treatments are used on a far more regular basis to keep infestations under control. Currently, while organic salmon farms are required to keep data on chemical use, this data is not gathered by any government authority. When requested the government has been unable to provide it, instead directing interested parties to the operators who simply refuse to make this data public. This begs the questions: how can organic salmon farms be allowed to emit chemicals without any public record? And, what have they got to hide?

Stocking Densities and fish health

Another key issue in organic salmon farming is fish health. While organic salmon farms typically stock at half the density of conventional salmon farms, the reality is fish are still kept in very crowded cages a mere 40 metres in diameter. Regulations state that every 10kg of salmon has a cubic metre of water. This roughly equates to bathtub of water per adult salmon. In the wild salmon can live for up to 16 years and will migrate up to 14,000 kilometres. Indeed, the only resemblance between a salmon’s natural environment and an organic salmon farm is that the latter is suspended in seawater.
“Organic salmon farmers argue that they’re more humane as they stock at lower densities. But, they’re still taking a fish that would normally swim thousands of kilometres across the oceans and sticking it in a cage. Organic chicken farming does not allow hens in small cages even though they actually walk only very short distances.” Breda O’Sullivan, Save Bantry Bay.
As with all intensive farming practices that involve animals being kept as such high densities, salmon farming poses risks for uncontrollable spread of disease. In 2012, Ireland saw outbreaks of amoebic gill disease in organic salmon farms all around the coast, resulting in mass fish kills. In a desperate bid to save profits, where operators saw farms were at risk of being affected by amoebic gill disease, they slaughtered fish early with this stock then entering the market.

Pollution of the marine environment

Waste produced by a salmon farm (fish faeces) is high the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus. An average size salmon farm of 14 cages produces waste containing similar quantities of these nutrients as would a town the size of Bantry. While no land based farm is allowed to discharge such waste directly into the environment, this is permitted in organic salmon farming. The result is reduced water quality, and an environment ripe for the development of harmful algal blooms.
Equally bad are the discharges relating to sea lice treatments. Sea lice are a copepod crustacean, and it should therefore come as no surprise that treatments designed to kill them also have a detrimental impact of other crustaceans such as lobster, crab, shrimp and prawn. Today organic salmon farming permits the use of pesticide based SLICE® (Emamectin Benzoate) which is very toxic to aquatic organisms and may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment; Alphamax® (Deltamethrin) which is toxic to crustaceous animals, and must not be used when local sea currents leads to risk of exposure; and Excis® (Cypermethrin) which is also hazardous for the environment, and is extremely dangerous to fish. Hydrogen peroxide, whose eco-toxicity is unknown, is also allowed even though it has been stated to be highly aversive to fish and can cause mortalities.
Any consumer purchasing organic salmon in the belief they are protecting the environment from pollution could not be more wrong. Yet, this is what today’s organic labelling scheme encourages.

Wild salmon and protected species at risk
All salmon farms experience sea lice. Research shows these sea lice emanating from salmon farms can cause anything from a 40-50% reduction in nearby wild salmon populations. Despite Atlantic Salmon being a protected species, whose numbers have been in rapid decline over recent decades, salmon farming continues to devastate wild populations. It is for this reason recommendations have been made that no salmon farm should be placed within 20km of a wild salmon river. Yet organic standards have no such requirement, and are often located only a kilometre or two of salmon river mouths.

Further problems arises as organic salmon farms import smolt (young salmon) that bears no relation to local wild salmon. As farmed salmon often escape, they in turn breed with wild salmon, weakening them genetically. Here again organic standards fail to protect wild salmon by not including on a zero escape policy
What is more, many other protected species including sea birds, seals, otters and small cetaceans (dolphins and porpoises) are attracted to salmon farms as a ready food source. They frequently get tangled in nets and drown. To date no measures to protect against predators have been completely effective. Seals soon become accustomed to acoustic scarers, birds continue to get tangled in nets covering pens. In Scotland, salmon farmers are now be awarded licences to shoot seals with almost 1,000 being shot in the last two years.

Organic principles call for the protection of the environment from degradation, erosion and pollution. So why is it that an industry that is associated with environmental degradation, habitat and species erosion, and pollution, is included in organic standards? Not only does this make a mockery of organic standards, it also misleads the conscientious consumers who chooses ‘organic’ salmon believing they are protecting the environment.
“When the Soil Association (UK) chose to certify farmed salmon using standards that still allowed the problems of open-cages to persist, it’s Chairman, Lawrence Woodward, resigned stating ‘Salmon farming in cages has nothing to at all to do with organic principles. It is very regrettable that the soil association has gone down this line of trying to certify something that is so distant from the principles.” BBC, Concern Over Organic Salmon Farms, 2006.

Thursday, 1 August 2013

Ummera Smokehouse sells Farmed Salmon

This tastey looking and fanciful packaged piece of smoked salmon looks great to an unsuspecting consumer. Nowhere on the packaging does it state that the salmon is actually sourced from Farmed Salmon!

In an article online http://goodfoodireland.ie/producer/ummera-smoked-products/803

"Owner Anthony Creswell's award winning Ummera Smokehouse situated in peaceful, rural West Cork, Ireland by the banks of the Argideen River, is a leading light in food production and environmentally friendly practices.
This second generation artisan, who took over the smokehouse his father Keith started in the 70's, has strived to develop the original fish smoking business whilst taking on board the impact that fishing for wild salmon has had on river stocking levels in recent years. To this end, Anthony chose a few years ago to make the changeover to sourcing organic farmed salmon from Clare Island Co. Mayo, as stocks of wild salmon were in decline. This change preceded the wild salmon fishing ban that ensued from 2007.

The fish Anthony smokes are the finest of specimens, organically farmed off the west coast of Ireland. Salmon are treated with tender loving care at the hands of this Master Smoker. In the cure, Anthony uses a mix of organic Portuguese sea salt and Costa Rican pure cane sugar before smoking his fish over wood chippings obtained from sustainable forests. Outside the smokery, a natural wetland and vermi-composting unit deals with waste from production. So this small eco-business produces fabulous artisan produce, thriving in the heart of its natural country surroundings, and doing little damage to the environment around it."